Ryzen 7 4800H vs Core i9-10900F benchmarks
According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Core i9-10900F is faster than the Ryzen 7 4800H. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Ryzen 7 4800H in all gaming tests too.
When comparing core counts for these CPUs, we notice that the Core i9-10900F has slightly more cores with 10 cores compared to the Ryzen 7 4800H that has 8 cores. It also has more threads than the Ryzen 7 4800H. Our comparison shows that the Ryzen 7 4800H has a slightly higher clock speed compared to the Core i9-10900F. Despite this, the Core i9-10900F has a slightly higher turbo speed. A Ryzen 7 4800H CPU outputs less heat than a Core i9-10900F CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. In terms of cache, the Ryzen 7 4800H has significantly more L2 cache when compared to the Core i9-10900F. Despite this, the Core i9-10900F has significantly more L3 cache compared to the Ryzen 7 4800H.
Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the Ryzen 7 4800H has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.
No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.