AMD Radeon R9 390 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Compare AMD Radeon R9 390 8 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 12 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1919 points
16% slightly better overall score
1650 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

44 FPS
8 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate
37 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

28 FPS
6 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate
23 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

39 FPS
15 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
24 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

15 FPS
20 FPS
4 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R9 390 and the Quadro K6000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

46328 points
162% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
17636 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

49594 points
118% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
22673 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

43704 points
83% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
23863 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

51251 points
101% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
25409 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1000 MHz
25% slightly higher core clock speed
797 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1000 MHz
10% slightly higher boost clock speed
902 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

8 GiB
12 GiB
49% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

512 Bit
33% slightly larger memory bus width
384 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

384 GB/s
33% slightly higher memory bandwidth
288.4 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

275 W
225 W
22% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

64 Gigapixels/s
18% slightly higher pixel rate
54.12 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

160 Gigatexels/s
216.5 Gigatexels/s
35% slightly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

5.12 TFLOPS
5.20 TFLOPS
1% slightly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

2560
2880
12% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

160
240
49% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

64
33% slightly more render output processors
48

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

215th of 586
229th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R9 300 Series
-

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 June
2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
11.2

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.5

Radeon R9 390 vs Quadro K6000 benchmarks

For gaming, the Radeon R9 390 graphics card is better than the Quadro K6000 in our tests.

The Radeon R9 390 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the Radeon R9 390 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

As stated by the manufacturer, the Quadro K6000 has significantly more memory with 12 GiB of memory compared to 8 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro K6000 has a slightly lower TDP at 225 W when compared to the Radeon R9 390 at 275 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Radeon R9 390 is better than the Quadro K6000.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons