NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro 4000M 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 8 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

250 points
287 points
14% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

7 FPS
Identical
7 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

4 FPS
4 FPS
0 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

4 FPS
4 FPS
0 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

3 FPS
3 FPS
0 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro 4000M and the Quadro K5100M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4216 points
7697 points
82% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5211 points
11800 points
126% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

475 MHz
771 MHz
62% significantly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB
8 GiB
300% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit
Identical
256 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

80 GB/s
115.2 GB/s
44% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

100 W
Identical
100 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

6.65 Gigapixels/s
24.67 Gigapixels/s
270% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

26.6 Gigatexels/s
98.69 Gigatexels/s
271% significantly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

336
1536
357% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

56
128
128% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
Identical
32

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

399th of 586
384th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

-
2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0
11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.5

Quadro 4000M vs Quadro K5100M specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the Quadro K5100M beats the Quadro 4000M in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the Quadro K5100M has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the Quadro K5100M has significantly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, both the Quadro 4000M and the Quadro K5100M have an identical TDP. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Quadro K5100M is better than the Quadro 4000M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons