Intel HD 4000 vs Intel HD 510

Compare Intel HD 4000 vs Intel HD 510, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

74 points

13% slightly better overall score

65 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

2 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

2 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

1 FPS

0 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

2 FPS

0 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

1 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

1 FPS

0 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

0 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the HD 4000 and the HD 510? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

990 points

2699 points

172% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

1287 points

2757 points

114% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

542 points

2368 points

336% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

1075 points

2589 points

140% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

650 MHz

85% significantly higher core clock speed

350 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1000 MHz

5% slightly higher boost clock speed

950 MHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

45 W

15 W

200% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

2 Gigapixels/s

5% slightly higher pixel rate

1.9 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

16 Gigatexels/s

40% slightly higher texture rate

11.4 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

128

33% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

33% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

523rd of 586

531st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 September

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.1

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.0

4.6

HD 4000 vs HD 510 comparison

For gaming, the HD 510 graphics card is better than the HD 4000 in our tests.

The HD 4000 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the HD 4000 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

In addition, the HD 510 has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the HD 4000 at 45 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the HD 510 over the HD 4000.