NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 16 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 1299.99
$ 1120.95
$ 179.04 slightly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

137 %
90% significantly better overall score
72 %

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

318 FPS
144 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
175 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

166 FPS
78 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
88 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

238 FPS
117 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
121 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

132 FPS
65 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
67 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce RTX 3090 and the RTX A4000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

19854
80% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score
10987
Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

6002.46
78% significantly higher Blender score
3362.00
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

238123
91% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
124547
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

204921
76% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
116149
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

138859
66% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
83390
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

196662
61% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
121897
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

174764
68% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
103883

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1400 MHz
90% significantly higher core clock speed
735 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1695 MHz
8% slightly higher boost clock speed
1560 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

24 GiB
49% significantly more memory
16 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

384 Bit
49% significantly larger memory bus width
256 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

936.2 GB/s
108% significantly higher memory bandwidth
448 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

350 W
140 W
150% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

189.8 Gigapixels/s
26% slightly higher pixel rate
149.8 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

556 Gigatexels/s
85% significantly higher texture rate
299.5 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

35.58 TFLOPS
85% significantly better floating point performance
19.17 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

10496
70% significantly more shading units
6144

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

328
70% significantly more texture mapping units
192

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

112
16% slightly more render output processors
96

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

9th of 549
23rd of 549

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

September 2020
April 2021

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6X
GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.6

GeForce RTX 3090 vs RTX A4000 comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce RTX 3090 GPU is faster than the RTX A4000 in gaming.

In our comparison, the GeForce RTX 3090 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce RTX 3090 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the GeForce RTX 3090 has significantly more memory with 24 GiB of memory compared to 16 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the RTX A4000 has a significantly lower TDP at 140 W when compared to the GeForce RTX 3090 at 350 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce RTX 3090 over the RTX A4000.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons