NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 12 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

2207 points
33% slightly better overall score
1650 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

47 FPS
11 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate
37 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

29 FPS
7 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate
23 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

35 FPS
11 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
24 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

22 FPS
2 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate
20 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and the Quadro K6000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

441.58 points
24% slightly higher Blender score
354.70 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

41158 points
134% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
17571 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

40474 points
129% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
17636 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

36968 points
63% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
22673 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

39947 points
67% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
23863 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

38942 points
53% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
25409 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1035 MHz
29% slightly higher core clock speed
797 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1200 MHz
33% slightly higher boost clock speed
902 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB
12 GiB
200% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
384 Bit
200% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

160 GB/s
288.4 GB/s
80% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

35 W
542% significantly lower TDP
225 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

38.4 Gigapixels/s
54.12 Gigapixels/s
40% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

76.8 Gigatexels/s
216.5 Gigatexels/s
181% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.46 TFLOPS
5.20 TFLOPS
111% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024
2880
181% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

64
240
274% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
48
49% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

195th of 586
231st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2020 April
2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
11.2

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.5

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs Quadro K6000 comparison

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q graphics card is better than the Quadro K6000 in our tests.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

As stated by the manufacturer, the Quadro K6000 has significantly more memory with 12 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has a significantly lower TDP at 35 W when compared to the Quadro K6000 at 225 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q over the Quadro K6000.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons