Intel Xeon E5-1620 vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

Compare Intel Xeon E5 Family 4 core CPU vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO Desktop with Radeon Vega Graphics 4 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

2735 points
1% slightly better overall score
2702 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

4274 points
4949 points
15% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

2280 points
10% slightly better multitasking score
2068 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

2192 points
10% slightly better heavy workload score
1983 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Xeon E5-1620 and the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

40.70 points
51.89 points
27% slightly higher Blender score

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

4
Identical
4

Threads

Number of logical processing units

8
100% significantly more threads
4

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3.6 GHz
Identical
3.6 GHz

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

3.8 GHz
4 GHz
5% slightly higher turbo speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

130 W
65 W
100% significantly lower TDP

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

4
100% significantly more memory channels
2

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

582nd of 1,089
589th of 1,089

Family

The product line

Xeon E5 Family
Ryzen 3 PRO Desktop with Radeon Vega Graphics

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2012 February
2019 September

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3-1066
DDR4

Is Unlocked

Can this CPU can be overclocked

-
No

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes
-

Xeon E5-1620 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is faster than the Xeon E5-1620. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Xeon E5-1620 in all gaming tests too.

Info from our database shows that they both have the same core count but the Xeon E5-1620 has more threads. In terms of clock speed, the Xeon E5-1620 and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G are identical in this regard.

Modern CPUs generally have more logical cores than physical cores, this means that each core is split into multiple virtual cores, improving efficiency for parallel workloads. Indeed, the Xeon E5-1620 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular CPU Comparisons