Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

Compare Intel Xeon E5 v4 Family 4 core CPU vs AMD Ryzen 3 PRO Desktop with Radeon Vega Graphics 4 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

2777 points
2% slightly better overall score
2702 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

4309 points
4949 points
14% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

2303 points
11% slightly better multitasking score
2068 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

2209 points
11% slightly better heavy workload score
1983 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Xeon E5-1620 v4 and the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

65.44 points
26% slightly higher Blender score
51.89 points

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

4
Identical
4

Threads

Number of logical processing units

8
100% significantly more threads
4

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
2% slightly higher clock speed

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

3.8 GHz
4 GHz
5% slightly higher turbo speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

140 W
65 W
115% significantly lower TDP

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

4
100% significantly more memory channels
2

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

576th of 1,089
589th of 1,089

Family

The product line

Xeon E5 v4 Family
Ryzen 3 PRO Desktop with Radeon Vega Graphics

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 May
2019 September

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4-1600
DDR4

Is Unlocked

Can this CPU can be overclocked

-
No

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes
-

Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the Xeon E5-1620 v4 beats the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G in overall performance. Despite this, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has the advantage in our gaming benchmark.

Our spec comparison shows that they have an identical amount of cores but the Xeon E5-1620 v4 has more threads. With our hardware info, we find that the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a slightly higher clock speed than the Xeon E5-1620 v4.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Xeon E5-1620 v4 has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular CPU Comparisons