Intel Xeon E5-1603 vs Intel N95

Compare Intel 4 core CPU vs Intel 4 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

1564 points

0.71% slightly better overall score

1553 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

2883 points

2944 points

2% slightly better gaming score

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

1194 points

1% slightly better multitasking score

1175 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

1145 points

1% slightly better heavy workload score

1127 points

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Xeon E5-1603 and the N95? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

22.30 points

28.97 points

29% slightly higher Blender score

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

Identical

Threads

Number of logical processing units

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

793rd of 1,089

800th of 1,089

Xeon E5-1603 vs N95 comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the N95 is faster than the Xeon E5-1603. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Xeon E5-1603 in all gaming tests too.

Info from our database shows that they both have the same core count and the same number of threads.

Most CPUs have more threads than cores. This technology, colloquially called hyperthreading, improves performance by splitting a core into multiple virtual ones. This provides more efficient utilisation of a core. For instance, the Xeon E5-1603 has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.