AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Intel Xeon Gold 6138

Compare AMD Ryzen Threadripper 16 core CPU vs Intel Xeon Scalable 20 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

7764 points
3% slightly better overall score
7502 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

7302 points
12% slightly better gaming score
6488 points

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

7916 points
0.30% slightly better multitasking score
7892 points

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

7971 points
8110 points
1% slightly better heavy workload score

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and the Xeon Gold 6138? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

262.92 points
268.08 points
1% slightly higher Blender score
Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

7983 points
8088 points
1% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score
Geekbench 6 (single) score

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

1180 points
7% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score
1102 points

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

16
20
25% slightly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

32
40
25% slightly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

3.4 GHz
70% significantly higher clock speed
2.00 GHz

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

4 GHz
8% slightly higher turbo speed
3.7 GHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

180 W
125 W
44% significantly lower TDP

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

4
6
49% significantly more memory channels

L2 Cache

Secondary embedded memory, slower than L1 cache

8 MiB
20 MiB
150% significantly more L2 cache

L3 Cache

General memory pool for all cores

32 MiB
16% slightly more L3 cache
27.5 MiB

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

164th of 1,114
175th of 1,114

Family

The product line

Ryzen Threadripper
Xeon Scalable

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 July
2017 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR4
DDR4-2666

Is Unlocked

Can this CPU can be overclocked

Yes
-

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

-
Yes

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Xeon Gold 6138 specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark tool, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is faster than the Xeon Gold 6138. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Xeon Gold 6138 in all gaming tests too.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Xeon Gold 6138 has slightly more cores than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. Indeed, the Xeon Gold 6138 has 20 cores compared to 16 cores found in the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. It also has more threads than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. Our comparison shows that the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a significantly higher clock speed compared to the Xeon Gold 6138. Also, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has a slightly higher turbo speed. The Xeon Gold 6138 outputs less heat than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the Xeon Gold 6138 has significantly more L2 cache than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. Despite this, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has slightly more L3 cache compared to the Xeon Gold 6138.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular CPU Comparisons