AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4

Compare AMD Ryzen 9 8 core CPU vs Intel Xeon E5 v4 Family 16 core processor, specs and benchmark score. Which is the better CPU for gaming?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

CPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare processors

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

A combined score of all workloads

8447 points

1% slightly better overall score

8324 points

Gaming Score

The raw gaming performance with a fast GPU

10377 points

67% significantly better gaming score

6186 points

Multitasking Score

Performance in workloads using up to 8 cores

7810 points

9116 points

16% slightly better multitasking score

Heavy Workload Score

Performance in workloads using up to 16 cores

7629 points

9598 points

25% slightly better heavy workload score

Free CPU Benchmark

Want to compare your processor against the Ryzen 9 7940HS and the Xeon E5-2697A v4? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download CPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

225.40 points

0.44% slightly higher Blender score

224.42 points

Geekbench 6 (multi) score

Multi threaded benchmark

11485 points

38% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (multi) score

8264 points

Geekbench 6 (single) score

Single threaded benchmark

2444 points

130% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (single) score

1062 points

Specifications

Cores

Number of physical processing units

100% significantly more cores

Threads

Number of logical processing units

100% significantly more threads

Clock Speed

Base frequency at which the chip operates

4.00 GHz

53% significantly higher clock speed

2.60 GHz

Turbo Speed

Higher frequency used for heavy workloads

5.2 GHz

44% significantly higher turbo speed

3.6 GHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the CPU

54 W

168% significantly lower TDP

145 W

Memory Channels

Lanes for simultaneous memory access

100% significantly more memory channels

L2 Cache

Secondary embedded memory, slower than L1 cache

8 MiB

100% significantly more L2 cache

4 MiB

L3 Cache

General memory pool for all cores

16 MiB

40 MiB

150% significantly more L3 cache

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

129th of 1,092

135th of 1,092

Family

The product line

Ryzen 9

Xeon E5 v4 Family

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2023 April

2016 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR5 (FP7r2)

DDR4-1600

Is Unlocked

Can this CPU can be overclocked

Supports ECC memory

Does this CPU support error correcting memory

Yes

Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Xeon E5-2697A v4 benchmarks

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Ryzen 9 7940HS performs better than the Xeon E5-2697A v4. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Xeon E5-2697A v4 in all gaming tests too.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Xeon E5-2697A v4 has significantly more cores than the Ryzen 9 7940HS. Indeed, the Xeon E5-2697A v4 has 16 cores compared to 8 cores found in the Ryzen 9 7940HS. It also has more threads than the Ryzen 9 7940HS. With our hardware info, we find that the Ryzen 9 7940HS has a significantly higher clock speed than the Xeon E5-2697A v4. Also, the Ryzen 9 7940HS has a significantly higher turbo speed. A Ryzen 9 7940HS CPU outputs less heat than a Xeon E5-2697A v4 CPU because of its significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The info from our database shows that the Ryzen 9 7940HS has more L2 cache than the Xeon E5-2697A v4. Despite this, the Xeon E5-2697A v4 has significantly more L3 cache compared to the Ryzen 9 7940HS.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. Indeed, the Ryzen 9 7940HS has more threads than cores. Each physical core is split into multiple threads.