AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Intel Core i3-N300

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G vs Core i3-N300 comparison

Our benchmark analysis concludes that the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G performs better than the Core i3-N300. Furthermore, our gaming benchmark shows that it also outperforms the Core i3-N300 in all gaming tests too.

In terms of the number of cores of each of these CPUs, the Core i3-N300 has significantly more cores than the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. Indeed, the Core i3-N300 has 8 cores compared to 4 cores found in the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. It also has more threads than the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. These CPUs have different clock speeds. Indeed, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a significantly higher clock speed compared to the Core i3-N300. Also, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has a slightly higher turbo speed. The Core i3-N300 outputs less heat than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G thanks to a significantly lower TDP. This measures the amount of heat they output and can be used to estimate power consumption. The cache sizes of these CPUs are different. Indeed, the Core i3-N300 has significantly more L2 cache than the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G. The Core i3-N300 also has significantly more L3 cache.

The more cores a CPU has, the better the overall performance will be in parallel workloads such as multitasking. Many CPUs have more threads than cores, this means that each physical core is split into multiple logical cores, making them more efficient. For instance, the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has the same number of threads as cores. This means the the CPU does not support hyperthreading.