AMD Radeon R9 380 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Compare AMD Radeon R9 380 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 589.00

$ 180.00

$ 409.00 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1280 points

1483 points

15% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

29 FPS

32 FPS

3 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

19 FPS

23 FPS

4 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

26 FPS

4 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

22 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

10 FPS

18 FPS

8 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R9 380 and the Quadro P2000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

2801 points

2953 points

5% slightly higher 3DMark Graphics score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

29877 points

25% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

23869 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

33763 points

45% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

23151 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

28196 points

23% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

22747 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

33667 points

43% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

23501 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

970 MHz

1076 MHz

10% slightly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

970 MHz

1480 MHz

52% significantly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

60% significantly larger memory bus width

160 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

4 GB/s

140.2 GB/s

3404% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

190 W

75 W

153% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

31.04 Gigapixels/s

59.2 Gigapixels/s

90% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

108.6 Gigatexels/s

14% slightly higher texture rate

94.72 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

3.48 TFLOPS

14% slightly better floating point performance

3.03 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1792

75% significantly more shading units

1024

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

112

75% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

25% slightly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

245th of 586

234th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R9 300 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 June

2017 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

Radeon R9 380 vs Quadro P2000 specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the Quadro P2000 beats the Radeon R9 380 in gaming performance.

The Quadro P2000 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the Quadro P2000 also has a significantly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the Quadro P2000 has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the Radeon R9 380 at 190 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Quadro P2000 over the Radeon R9 380.