AMD Radeon R9 370 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Compare AMD Radeon R9 370 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 1054.00

$ 199.95

$ 854.05 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

807 points

61% significantly better overall score

501 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

19 FPS

8 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

11 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

12 FPS

2 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

9 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

16 FPS

8 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

9 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

6 FPS

8 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R9 370 and the Quadro M2000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

24591 points

132% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

10557 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

26499 points

157% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

10308 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

25257 points

149% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

10116 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

26499 points

173% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

9696 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

950 MHz

1029 MHz

8% slightly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

975 MHz

1098 MHz

12% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

Identical

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

179.2 GB/s

123% significantly higher memory bandwidth

80.19 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

150 W

55 W

172% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

31.2 Gigapixels/s

77% significantly higher pixel rate

17.57 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

78 Gigatexels/s

77% significantly higher texture rate

43.92 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1280

100% significantly more shading units

640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

100% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

279th of 586

328th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 May

2015 December

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Radeon R9 370 vs Quadro M2000M benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the Radeon R9 370 beats the Quadro M2000M in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the Quadro M2000M has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the Quadro M2000M also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Quadro M2000M has a significantly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the Radeon R9 370 at 150 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Radeon R9 370 is better than the Quadro M2000M.