AMD Radeon R9 280X vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Compare AMD Radeon R9 280X 3 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1687 points
236% significantly better overall score
501 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

40 FPS
29 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
11 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

25 FPS
15 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
9 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

35 FPS
27 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
9 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

14 FPS
6 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
8 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R9 280X and the Quadro M2000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

850 MHz
1029 MHz
21% slightly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1000 MHz
1098 MHz
9% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

3 GiB
4 GiB
33% slightly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

384 Bit
200% significantly larger memory bus width
128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

288 GB/s
259% significantly higher memory bandwidth
80.19 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

250 W
55 W
354% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

32 Gigapixels/s
82% significantly higher pixel rate
17.57 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

128 Gigatexels/s
191% significantly higher texture rate
43.92 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

2048
220% significantly more shading units
640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

128
220% significantly more texture mapping units
40

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
100% significantly more render output processors
16

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

226th of 586
328th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R9 200 Series
-

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

-
2015 December

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.5

Radeon R9 280X vs Quadro M2000M benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Radeon R9 280X GPU is faster than the Quadro M2000M in gaming.

In our comparison, the Quadro M2000M has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the Quadro M2000M also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Quadro M2000M has slightly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 3 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro M2000M has a significantly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the Radeon R9 280X at 250 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Radeon R9 280X over the Quadro M2000M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons