AMD Radeon R9 280 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Compare AMD Radeon R9 280 3 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 399.00
$ 180.00
$ 219.00 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1280 points
1483 points
15% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

30 FPS
32 FPS
2 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

19 FPS
23 FPS
4 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

27 FPS
5 FPS slightly higher City frame rate
22 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

10 FPS
18 FPS
8 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R9 280 and the Quadro P2000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

2043 points
2953 points
44% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

827 MHz
1076 MHz
30% slightly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

933 MHz
1480 MHz
58% significantly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

384 Bit
139% significantly larger memory bus width
160 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

240 GB/s
71% significantly higher memory bandwidth
140.2 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

250 W
75 W
233% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

29.86 Gigapixels/s
59.2 Gigapixels/s
98% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

104.5 Gigatexels/s
10% slightly higher texture rate
94.72 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

3.34 TFLOPS
10% slightly better floating point performance
3.03 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1792
75% significantly more shading units
1024

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

112
75% significantly more texture mapping units
64

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

32
40
25% slightly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

244th of 586
234th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R9 200 Series
-

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

-
2017 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.6

Radeon R9 280 vs Quadro P2000 specs and performance

For gaming, the Radeon R9 280 graphics card is better than the Quadro P2000 in our tests.

In our comparison, the Quadro P2000 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the Quadro P2000 also has a significantly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

In addition, the Quadro P2000 has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the Radeon R9 280 at 250 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Radeon R9 280 is better than the Quadro P2000.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons