AMD Radeon R7 360 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Compare AMD Radeon R7 360 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 2151.00
$ 199.95
$ 1951.05 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

538 points
7% slightly better overall score
501 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

13 FPS
1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate
11 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

8 FPS
9 FPS
1 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

11 FPS
2 FPS slightly higher City frame rate
9 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

4 FPS
8 FPS
3 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R7 360 and the Quadro M2000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

17603 points
66% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
10557 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

17970 points
74% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
10308 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

16200 points
60% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
10116 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

15685 points
61% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
9696 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1050 MHz
2% slightly higher core clock speed
1029 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1000 MHz
1098 MHz
9% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB
4 GiB
100% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
Identical
128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

112 GB/s
39% slightly higher memory bandwidth
80.19 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

100 W
55 W
81% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

16.8 Gigapixels/s
17.57 Gigapixels/s
4% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

50.4 Gigatexels/s
14% slightly higher texture rate
43.92 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

768
20% slightly more shading units
640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

48
20% slightly more texture mapping units
40

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

16
Identical
16

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

319th of 586
328th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R7 300 Series
-

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 June
2015 December

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.5

Radeon R7 360 vs Quadro M2000M specs and performance

For gaming, the Quadro M2000M graphics card is better than the Radeon R7 360 in our tests.

The Radeon R7 360 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. Despite this, the Quadro M2000M has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the Quadro M2000M has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro M2000M has a significantly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the Radeon R7 360 at 100 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Quadro M2000M over the Radeon R7 360.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons