AMD Radeon R7 260X vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

Compare AMD Radeon R7 260X 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

779 points
853 points
9% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

19 FPS
20 FPS
1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

11 FPS
13 FPS
1 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

16 FPS
3 FPS slightly higher City frame rate
13 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

6 FPS
11 FPS
4 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R7 260X and the Quadro P1000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1100 MHz
1354 MHz
23% slightly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1000 MHz
1480 MHz
47% significantly higher boost clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB
4 GiB
100% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
Identical
128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

104 GB/s
29% slightly higher memory bandwidth
80.19 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

115 W
47 W
144% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

17.6 Gigapixels/s
47.36 Gigapixels/s
169% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

61.6 Gigatexels/s
4% slightly higher texture rate
59.2 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

1.97 TFLOPS
4% slightly better floating point performance
1.89 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

896
40% slightly more shading units
640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

56
40% slightly more texture mapping units
40

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

16
32
100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

284th of 586
272nd of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R7 200 Series
-

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

-
2017 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.4
4.5

Radeon R7 260X vs Quadro P1000 benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the Quadro P1000 beats the Radeon R7 260X in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the Quadro P1000 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the Quadro P1000 also has a significantly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Quadro P1000 has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro P1000 has a significantly lower TDP at 47 W when compared to the Radeon R7 260X at 115 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro P1000 is faster than the Radeon R7 260X.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons