AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

Compare AMD Radeon R7 250 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 100.01

$ 88.02

$ 11.99 slightly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

352 points

40% slightly better overall score

250 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

9 FPS

2 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

7 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

5 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

4 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

7 FPS

3 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS

3 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R7 250 and the Quadro 4000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

10280 points

143% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

4216 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

9476 points

81% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

5211 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1000 MHz

110% significantly higher core clock speed

475 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB

Identical

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

72 GB/s

80 GB/s

11% slightly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

33% slightly lower TDP

100 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

14.8 Gigapixels/s

122% significantly higher pixel rate

6.65 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

29.6 Gigatexels/s

11% slightly higher texture rate

26.6 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

512

52% significantly more shading units

336

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

75% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

359th of 586

398th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R7 200 Series

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.4

4.5

Radeon R7 250 vs Quadro 4000M specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Quadro 4000M GPU is faster than the Radeon R7 250 in gaming.

The Radeon R7 250 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, they both have the same amount of memory at 2 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Radeon R7 250 has a slightly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the Quadro 4000M at 100 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro 4000M is faster than the Radeon R7 250.