AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

Compare AMD Radeon R7 250 2 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 3 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

352 points
816 points
131% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

9 FPS
18 FPS
10 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

5 FPS
11 FPS
6 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

7 FPS
13 FPS
5 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS
9 FPS
7 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Radeon R7 250 and the GeForce GTX 660? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

10280 points
11381 points
10% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

8744 points
10693 points
22% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

9476 points
11353 points
19% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

8020 points
11858 points
47% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1000 MHz
2% slightly higher core clock speed
980 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1050 MHz
1% slightly higher boost clock speed
1032 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB
3 GiB
49% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
192 Bit
49% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

72 GB/s
144.2 GB/s
100% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W
86% significantly lower TDP
140 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

14.8 Gigapixels/s
20.64 Gigapixels/s
39% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

29.6 Gigatexels/s
82.56 Gigatexels/s
178% significantly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

512
960
87% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

32
80
150% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

16
24
49% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

360th of 586
276th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon R7 200 Series
-

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.4
4.5

Radeon R7 250 vs GeForce GTX 660 specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 660 beats the Radeon R7 250 in gaming performance.

The Radeon R7 250 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the Radeon R7 250 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the GeForce GTX 660 has significantly more memory with 3 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Radeon R7 250 has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 660 at 140 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 660 over the Radeon R7 250.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons