NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 12 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 180.00

$ 89.96 significantly less expensive

$ 269.96

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1483 points

1650 points

11% slightly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

32 FPS

37 FPS

4 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

23 FPS

Identical

23 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

22 FPS

24 FPS

2 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

18 FPS

20 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro P2000 and the Quadro K6000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

225.21 points

354.70 points

57% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

21668 points

23% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

17571 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

23869 points

35% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

17636 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

23151 points

2% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

22673 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

22747 points

23863 points

4% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

23501 points

25409 points

8% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1076 MHz

35% slightly higher core clock speed

797 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1480 MHz

64% significantly higher boost clock speed

902 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

160 Bit

384 Bit

139% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

140.2 GB/s

288.4 GB/s

105% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

200% significantly lower TDP

225 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

59.2 Gigapixels/s

9% slightly higher pixel rate

54.12 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

94.72 Gigatexels/s

216.5 Gigatexels/s

128% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

3.03 TFLOPS

5.20 TFLOPS

71% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024

2880

181% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

240

274% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

20% slightly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

234th of 586

231st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 February

2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.2

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

Quadro P2000 vs Quadro K6000 specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Quadro K6000 GPU is faster than the Quadro P2000 in gaming.

The Quadro P2000 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the Quadro P2000 also has a significantly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the Quadro P2000 has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the Quadro K6000 at 225 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Quadro K6000 is better than the Quadro P2000.