NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs Intel Arc A370M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro M4000 8 GB vs Intel Arc A370M, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1252 points

5% slightly better overall score

1187 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

27 FPS

33 FPS

6 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

19 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

17 FPS

19 FPS

2 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

15 FPS

4 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

12 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro M4000 and the Arc A370M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

2302 points

3430 points

49% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

221.61 points

328.16 points

48% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

20001 points

29812 points

49% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

23838 points

28700 points

20% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

800 MHz

166% significantly higher core clock speed

300 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

300% significantly larger memory bus width

64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

192.3 GB/s

71% significantly higher memory bandwidth

112 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

120 W

35 W

242% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

49.47 Gigapixels/s

49.6 Gigapixels/s

0.26% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

80.39 Gigatexels/s

99.2 Gigatexels/s

23% slightly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.57 TFLOPS

3.17 TFLOPS

23% slightly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1664

62% significantly more shading units

1024

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

104

62% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

247th of 586

251st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 June

2022 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.4

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

4.6

Quadro M4000 vs Arc A370M specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Quadro M4000 GPU is faster than the Arc A370M in gaming.

In our comparison, the Quadro M4000 has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

In addition, the Arc A370M has a significantly lower TDP at 35 W when compared to the Quadro M4000 at 120 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Quadro M4000 is better than the Arc A370M.