NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Compare NVIDIA Quadro M2000 4 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 125.00

$ 119.99

$ 5.01 slightly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

974 points

118% significantly better overall score

445 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

21 FPS

11 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

11 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

14 FPS

8 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

7 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

14 FPS

5 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

10 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

12 FPS

8 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

4 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro M2000 and the Radeon Pro WX 3200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

14953 points

15640 points

4% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

15367 points

16510 points

7% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

14584 points

14637 points

0.36% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

14502 points

15582 points

7% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1180 MHz

1295 MHz

9% slightly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

Identical

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

105.8 GB/s

10% slightly higher memory bandwidth

96 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

75 W

65 W

15% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

37.22 Gigapixels/s

79% significantly higher pixel rate

20.72 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

55.82 Gigatexels/s

34% slightly higher texture rate

41.44 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

1.79 TFLOPS

7% slightly better floating point performance

1.66 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

768

20% slightly more shading units

640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

49% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

267th of 586

345th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon PRO

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2016 April

2019 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.1

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

4.6

Quadro M2000 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 specs and performance

For gaming, the Quadro M2000 graphics card is better than the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in our tests.

Our database shows that the Radeon Pro WX 3200 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that they both have the same amount of memory at 4 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Radeon Pro WX 3200 has a slightly lower TDP at 65 W when compared to the Quadro M2000 at 75 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Quadro M2000 is better than the Radeon Pro WX 3200.