NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA T600

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K4200 4 GB vs NVIDIA T600, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA T600

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 149.46

$ 127.54 significantly less expensive

$ 277.00

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

899 points

1344 points

49% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

20 FPS

33 FPS

13 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

13 FPS

17 FPS

5 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

14 FPS

22 FPS

9 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

10 FPS

13 FPS

3 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K4200 and the T600? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

170.14 points

316.93 points

86% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

8973 points

28084 points

212% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11745 points

27240 points

131% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

11396 points

25594 points

124% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

12321 points

27576 points

123% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

12444 points

25658 points

106% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

780 MHz

6% slightly higher core clock speed

735 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

784 MHz

1335 MHz

70% significantly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

172.8 GB/s

8% slightly higher memory bandwidth

160 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

105 W

40 W

162% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

21.95 Gigapixels/s

42.72 Gigapixels/s

94% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

87.81 Gigatexels/s

64% significantly higher texture rate

53.4 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.11 TFLOPS

23% slightly better floating point performance

1.71 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1344

110% significantly more shading units

640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

112

180% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

271st of 586

240th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 July

2021 April

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

GDDR6

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

4.6

Quadro K4200 vs T600 specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the T600 beats the Quadro K4200 in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the Quadro K4200 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. Despite this, the T600 has a significantly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

In addition, the T600 has a significantly lower TDP at 40 W when compared to the Quadro K4200 at 105 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the T600 is better than the Quadro K4200.