NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K4200 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 24 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 149.46

$ 1350.49 significantly less expensive

$ 1499.95

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

899 points

16207 points

1702% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

20 FPS

382 FPS

363 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

13 FPS

188 FPS

175 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

14 FPS

275 FPS

262 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

10 FPS

151 FPS

141 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K4200 and the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

170.14 points

6069.41 points

3467% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

8973 points

260346 points

2801% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11745 points

229738 points

1856% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

11396 points

141134 points

1138% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

12321 points

207329 points

1582% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

12444 points

187369 points

1405% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

780 MHz

1560 MHz

100% significantly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

784 MHz

1560 MHz

98% significantly higher boost clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

24 GiB

499% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

384 Bit

49% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

172.8 GB/s

1008 GB/s

483% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

105 W

328% significantly lower TDP

450 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

21.95 Gigapixels/s

208.3 Gigapixels/s

848% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

87.81 Gigatexels/s

625 Gigatexels/s

611% significantly higher texture rate

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

2.11 TFLOPS

40 TFLOPS

1798% significantly better floating point performance

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1344

10752

700% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

112

336

200% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

112

250% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

271st of 586

16th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 July

2022 January

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

GDDR6X

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

4.6

Quadro K4200 vs GeForce RTX 3090 Ti specs and performance

For gaming, the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti graphics card is better than the Quadro K4200 in our tests.

Our database shows that the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti also has a significantly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

As stated by the manufacturer, the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has significantly more memory with 24 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Quadro K4200 has a significantly lower TDP at 105 W when compared to the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti at 450 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti over the Quadro K4200.