NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs AMD Radeon R7 350

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 2 GB vs AMD Radeon R7 350, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

AMD Radeon R7 350

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 144.02

$ 39.98

$ 104.04 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

111 points

297 points

167% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

4 FPS

7 FPS

3 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

2 FPS

4 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

2 FPS

6 FPS

4 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

1 FPS

2 FPS

0 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K2000M and the Radeon R7 350? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

2575 points

10951 points

325% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

2616 points

9660 points

269% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3121 points

9524 points

205% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

2616 points

7976 points

204% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

745 MHz

1000 MHz

34% slightly higher core clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

28.8 GB/s

72 GB/s

150% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

55 W

Identical

55 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

5.96 Gigapixels/s

12.8 Gigapixels/s

114% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

23.84 Gigatexels/s

25.6 Gigatexels/s

7% slightly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

512

33% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

Identical

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

493rd of 586

377th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2012 June

2016 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

4.6

Quadro K2000M vs Radeon R7 350 benchmarks

For gaming, the Radeon R7 350 graphics card is better than the Quadro K2000M in our tests.

In our comparison, the Radeon R7 350 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

In addition, both the Quadro K2000M and the Radeon R7 350 have an identical TDP. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the Radeon R7 350 over the Quadro K2000M.