NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 144.02

$ 39.90

$ 104.12 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

111 points

445 points

300% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

4 FPS

10 FPS

6 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

2 FPS

8 FPS

6 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

2 FPS

8 FPS

6 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

1 FPS

7 FPS

5 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K2000M and the Quadro M1000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

34.53 points

98.53 points

185% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

2385 points

8471 points

255% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

2575 points

8927 points

246% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

2616 points

7809 points

198% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3121 points

8849 points

183% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

2616 points

8061 points

208% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

745 MHz

993 MHz

33% slightly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB

4 GiB

100% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

28.8 GB/s

80.19 GB/s

178% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

55 W

40 W

37% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

5.96 Gigapixels/s

15.89 Gigapixels/s

166% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

23.84 Gigatexels/s

31.78 Gigatexels/s

33% slightly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

512

33% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

Identical

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

494th of 586

342nd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2012 June

2015 August

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro K2000M vs Quadro M1000M benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Quadro M1000M GPU is faster than the Quadro K2000M in gaming.

Our database shows that the Quadro M1000M has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

As stated by the manufacturer, the Quadro M1000M has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro M1000M has a slightly lower TDP at 40 W when compared to the Quadro K2000M at 55 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro M1000M is faster than the Quadro K2000M.