NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M 1 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K610M

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 144.02

$ 4.00 slightly less expensive

$ 148.02

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

111 points

Identical

111 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

4 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

3 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

2 FPS

0 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

1 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

2 FPS

Identical

2 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

1 FPS

0 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

1 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K2000M and the Quadro K610M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

34.53 points

54% significantly higher Blender score

22.30 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

2385 points

58% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

1504 points

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

1676 points

41% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

1181 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

2575 points

40% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

1833 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

2616 points

40% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

1867 points

Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

1932 points

68% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

1150 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3121 points

56% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

1997 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

2616 points

40% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

1867 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

745 MHz

980 MHz

31% slightly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB

100% significantly more memory

1 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

28.8 GB/s

38% slightly higher memory bandwidth

20.8 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

55 W

30 W

83% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

5.96 Gigapixels/s

52% significantly higher pixel rate

3.92 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

23.84 Gigatexels/s

52% significantly higher texture rate

15.68 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

100% significantly more shading units

192

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

100% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

501st of 586

493rd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2012 June

2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro K2000M vs Quadro K610M comparison

For gaming, the Quadro K610M graphics card is better than the Quadro K2000M in our tests.

The Quadro K610M has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

As stated by the manufacturer, the Quadro K2000M has significantly more memory with 2 GiB of memory compared to 1 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Quadro K610M has a significantly lower TDP at 30 W when compared to the Quadro K2000M at 55 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Quadro K610M is better than the Quadro K2000M.