NVIDIA Quadro K2000D vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 163.96

$ 144.02

$ 19.94 slightly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

260 points

134% significantly better overall score

111 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

6 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

4 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

4 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

2 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

4 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

2 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

3 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

1 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K2000D and the Quadro K2000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3602 points

39% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

2575 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3916 points

25% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

3121 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

954 MHz

28% slightly higher core clock speed

745 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB

Identical

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

64 GB/s

122% significantly higher memory bandwidth

28.8 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

51 W

7% slightly lower TDP

55 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

7.63 Gigapixels/s

28% slightly higher pixel rate

5.96 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

30.53 Gigatexels/s

28% slightly higher texture rate

23.84 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

Identical

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

Identical

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

394th of 586

497th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 March

2012 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro K2000D vs Quadro K2000M benchmarks

For gaming, the Quadro K2000D graphics card is better than the Quadro K2000M in our tests.

In our comparison, the Quadro K2000D has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, they both have the same amount of memory at 2 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Quadro K2000D has a slightly lower TDP at 51 W when compared to the Quadro K2000M at 55 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Quadro K2000D is better than the Quadro K2000M.