NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K2000 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 136.96

$ 7.06 slightly less expensive

$ 144.02

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

250 points

125% significantly better overall score

111 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

6 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

4 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

4 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

2 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

4 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

2 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

3 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

1 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K2000 and the Quadro K2000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

44.49 points

28% slightly higher Blender score

34.53 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

3055 points

28% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

2385 points

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

2044 points

21% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

1676 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4071 points

58% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

2575 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3710 points

41% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

2616 points

Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

3713 points

92% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

1932 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4071 points

30% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

3121 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

4126 points

57% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

2616 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

954 MHz

28% slightly higher core clock speed

745 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB

Identical

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

64 GB/s

122% significantly higher memory bandwidth

28.8 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

51 W

7% slightly lower TDP

55 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

7.63 Gigapixels/s

28% slightly higher pixel rate

5.96 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

30.53 Gigatexels/s

28% slightly higher texture rate

23.84 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

Identical

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

Identical

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

Identical

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

401st of 586

501st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 March

2012 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro K2000 vs Quadro K2000M specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the Quadro K2000 GPU is faster than the Quadro K2000M in gaming.

Our database shows that the Quadro K2000 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that they both have the same amount of memory at 2 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Quadro K2000 has a slightly lower TDP at 51 W when compared to the Quadro K2000M at 55 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro K2000 is faster than the Quadro K2000M.