NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230

Compare NVIDIA Quadro K1200 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

436 points
27% slightly better overall score
343 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

9 FPS
0 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate
8 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

7 FPS
2 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
5 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

6 FPS
0 FPS slightly higher City frame rate
6 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

6 FPS
1 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
4 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro K1200 and the GeForce MX230? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

100.45 points
166% significantly higher Blender score
37.75 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

9073 points
31% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
6914 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

9031 points
26% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
7146 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

8697 points
22% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
7117 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

8804 points
29% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
6822 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

7699 points
21% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
6359 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1058 MHz
1519 MHz
43% significantly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1124 MHz
1531 MHz
36% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width
64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

80 GB/s
66% significantly higher memory bandwidth
48.06 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

45 W
10 W
350% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

17.98 Gigapixels/s
24.5 Gigapixels/s
36% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

35.97 Gigatexels/s
46% significantly higher texture rate
24.5 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

512
100% significantly more shading units
256

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

32
100% significantly more texture mapping units
16

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

16
Identical
16

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

347th of 586
361st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 January
2019 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.6

Quadro K1200 vs GeForce MX230 benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce MX230 GPU is faster than the Quadro K1200 in gaming.

The GeForce MX230 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce MX230 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

In addition, the GeForce MX230 has a significantly lower TDP at 10 W when compared to the Quadro K1200 at 45 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce MX230 is faster than the Quadro K1200.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons