NVIDIA Quadro 4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Compare NVIDIA Quadro 4000M 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 88.02

$ 75.94 significantly less expensive

$ 163.96

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

250 points

7% slightly better overall score

232 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

7 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

6 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

4 FPS

Identical

4 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

4 FPS

Identical

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

3 FPS

Identical

3 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Quadro 4000M and the Quadro K2000D? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4216 points

17% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

3602 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5211 points

33% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

3916 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

475 MHz

954 MHz

100% significantly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB

Identical

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

100% significantly larger memory bus width

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

80 GB/s

25% slightly higher memory bandwidth

64 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

100 W

51 W

96% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

6.65 Gigapixels/s

7.63 Gigapixels/s

14% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

26.6 Gigatexels/s

30.53 Gigatexels/s

14% slightly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

336

384

14% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

75% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

407th of 597

417th of 597

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2013 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

Quadro 4000M vs Quadro K2000D comparison

In our benchmarks, the Quadro 4000M beats the Quadro K2000D in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the Quadro K2000D has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

As stated by the manufacturer, they both have the same amount of memory at 2 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Quadro K2000D has a significantly lower TDP at 51 W when compared to the Quadro 4000M at 100 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Quadro 4000M is better than the Quadro K2000D.