Intel Iris Pro 5200 vs AMD Radeon R5 430

Compare Intel Iris Pro 5200 vs AMD Radeon R5 430, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

185 points
Identical
185 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

5 FPS
Identical
5 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

2 FPS
3 FPS
0 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

2 FPS
4 FPS
1 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS
1 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
1 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris Pro 5200 and the Radeon R5 430? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5106 points
5855 points
14% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4909 points
5652 points
15% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3791 points
4817 points
27% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

200 MHz
730 MHz
264% significantly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1150 MHz
47% significantly higher boost clock speed
780 MHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

45 W
11% slightly lower TDP
50 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

4.6 Gigapixels/s
6.24 Gigapixels/s
35% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

46 Gigatexels/s
145% significantly higher texture rate
18.72 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

320
384
20% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

40
66% significantly more texture mapping units
24

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

4
8
100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

437th of 586
441st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

-
2016 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

-
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.3
4.6

Iris Pro 5200 vs Radeon R5 430 specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the Radeon R5 430 beats the Iris Pro 5200 in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the Radeon R5 430 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. Despite this, the Iris Pro 5200 has a significantly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the Iris Pro 5200 has a slightly lower TDP at 45 W when compared to the Radeon R5 430 at 50 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Radeon R5 430 is faster than the Iris Pro 5200.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons