Intel Iris Pro 5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Compare Intel Iris Pro 5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

185 points

66% significantly better overall score

111 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

5 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

4 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

2 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

2 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

2 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

2 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

1 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris Pro 5200 and the Quadro K2000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5106 points

98% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

2575 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4909 points

57% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

3121 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3791 points

44% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

2616 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

200 MHz

745 MHz

272% significantly higher core clock speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

45 W

22% slightly lower TDP

55 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

4.6 Gigapixels/s

5.96 Gigapixels/s

29% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

46 Gigatexels/s

92% significantly higher texture rate

23.84 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

320

384

20% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

25% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

300% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

442nd of 586

494th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2012 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.3

4.5

Iris Pro 5200 vs Quadro K2000M comparison

For gaming, the Iris Pro 5200 graphics card is better than the Quadro K2000M in our tests.

Our database shows that the Quadro K2000M has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

In addition, the Iris Pro 5200 has a slightly lower TDP at 45 W when compared to the Quadro K2000M at 55 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the Iris Pro 5200 is better than the Quadro K2000M.