Intel Iris Pro 5200 vs NVIDIA GeForce 930M

Compare Intel Iris Pro 5200 vs NVIDIA GeForce 930M, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

185 points

315 points

70% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

5 FPS

7 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

2 FPS

5 FPS

3 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

2 FPS

5 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS

4 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris Pro 5200 and the GeForce 930M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

5106 points

5333 points

4% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4909 points

5294 points

7% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3791 points

4745 points

25% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

200 MHz

928 MHz

363% significantly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1150 MHz

22% slightly higher boost clock speed

941 MHz

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

45 W

33 W

36% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

4.6 Gigapixels/s

7.53 Gigapixels/s

63% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

46 Gigatexels/s

103% significantly higher texture rate

22.58 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

320

384

20% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

66% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

441st of 586

372nd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.3

4.6

Iris Pro 5200 vs GeForce 930M specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce 930M GPU is faster than the Iris Pro 5200 in gaming.

In our comparison, the GeForce 930M has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. Despite this, the Iris Pro 5200 has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the GeForce 930M has a slightly lower TDP at 33 W when compared to the Iris Pro 5200 at 45 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce 930M over the Iris Pro 5200.