Intel Iris Plus 640 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

Compare Intel Iris Plus 640 0 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 8 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

287 points

Identical

287 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

9 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

7 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

4 FPS

Identical

4 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

7 FPS

2 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

2 FPS

3 FPS

1 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the Iris Plus 640 and the Quadro K5100M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

6247 points

20% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

5204 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6601 points

7697 points

16% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

7862 points

8639 points

9% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6639 points

11800 points

77% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

300 MHz

771 MHz

156% significantly higher core clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

0.5 GiB

8 GiB

1500% significantly more memory

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

15 W

566% significantly lower TDP

100 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

6.6 Gigapixels/s

24.67 Gigapixels/s

273% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

52.8 Gigatexels/s

98.69 Gigatexels/s

86% significantly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

1536

300% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

128

166% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

433% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

385th of 586

386th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 January

2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.4

4.5

Iris Plus 640 vs Quadro K5100M comparison

For gaming, the Quadro K5100M graphics card is better than the Iris Plus 640 in our tests.

Our database shows that the Quadro K5100M has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

As stated by the manufacturer, the Quadro K5100M has significantly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 0.5 GiB. Memory size doesn't directly affect performance, but too little memory will certainly degrade gaming performance.

In addition, the Iris Plus 640 has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the Quadro K5100M at 100 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the Quadro K5100M is faster than the Iris Plus 640.