Intel HD 520 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Compare Intel HD 520 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

148 points

33% slightly better overall score

111 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

4 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

2 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

2 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

2 FPS

0 FPS slightly higher City frame rate

2 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

1 FPS

0 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the HD 520 and the Quadro K2000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

4231 points

64% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

2575 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

3998 points

52% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

2616 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

3990 points

27% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

3121 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

4427 points

69% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

2616 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

300 MHz

745 MHz

148% significantly higher core clock speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

15 W

266% significantly lower TDP

55 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

2.7 Gigapixels/s

5.96 Gigapixels/s

120% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

21.6 Gigatexels/s

23.84 Gigatexels/s

10% slightly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

192

384

100% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

33% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

433% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

467th of 586

493rd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2012 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

HD 520 vs Quadro K2000M specs and performance

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the HD 520 GPU is faster than the Quadro K2000M in gaming.

Our database shows that the Quadro K2000M has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

In addition, the HD 520 has a significantly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the Quadro K2000M at 55 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the HD 520 is faster than the Quadro K2000M.