Intel HD 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

Compare Intel HD 510 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

65 points
213 points
227% significantly better overall score

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

2 FPS
4 FPS
2 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

1 FPS
3 FPS
2 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

1 FPS
3 FPS
1 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

0 FPS
3 FPS
2 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the HD 510 and the GeForce 920MX? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

2699 points
4210 points
55% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

2757 points
3723 points
35% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

2368 points
4072 points
71% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

2589 points
3591 points
38% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

350 MHz
965 MHz
175% significantly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

950 MHz
993 MHz
4% slightly higher boost clock speed

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

15 W
6% slightly lower TDP
16 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

1.9 Gigapixels/s
7.94 Gigapixels/s
318% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

11.4 Gigatexels/s
23.83 Gigatexels/s
109% significantly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

96
256
166% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

12
24
100% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

2
8
300% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

529th of 586
422nd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 September
2016 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

-
DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.6

HD 510 vs GeForce 920MX specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the GeForce 920MX beats the HD 510 in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the GeForce 920MX has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce 920MX also has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

In addition, the HD 510 has a slightly lower TDP at 15 W when compared to the GeForce 920MX at 16 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce 920MX over the HD 510.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons