NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 1549.99
$ 77.11
$ 1472.88 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

13991 points
8755% significantly better overall score
158 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

333 FPS
328 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
5 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

169 FPS
166 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
3 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

241 FPS
238 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
3 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

134 FPS
133 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
1 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce RTX 3090 and the Quadro 3000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

204921 points
6980% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
2894 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

194465 points
5112% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
3731 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1400 MHz
211% significantly higher core clock speed
450 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

24 GiB
1100% significantly more memory
2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

384 Bit
49% significantly larger memory bus width
256 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

936.2 GB/s
1070% significantly higher memory bandwidth
80 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

350 W
75 W
366% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

189.8 Gigapixels/s
4117% significantly higher pixel rate
4.5 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

556 Gigatexels/s
2988% significantly higher texture rate
18 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

10496
4273% significantly more shading units
240

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

328
720% significantly more texture mapping units
40

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

112
250% significantly more render output processors
32

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

25th of 586
463rd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2020 September
-

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6X
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.5

GeForce RTX 3090 vs Quadro 3000M specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the GeForce RTX 3090 beats the Quadro 3000M in gaming performance.

The GeForce RTX 3090 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the GeForce RTX 3090 has significantly more memory with 24 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Quadro 3000M has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the GeForce RTX 3090 at 350 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce RTX 3090 is better than the Quadro 3000M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons