NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M 3 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

13991 points
867% significantly better overall score
1446 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

333 FPS
302 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
30 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

169 FPS
147 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
22 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

241 FPS
221 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
19 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

134 FPS
116 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
18 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce RTX 3090 and the GeForce GTX 970M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

19931 points
774% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score
2280 points
Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

5820.93 points
2720% significantly higher Blender score
206.38 points
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

238123 points
1202% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
18285 points
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

204921 points
923% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
20012 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

138859 points
538% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
21753 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

194465 points
900% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
19440 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

179816 points
817% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
19602 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1400 MHz
51% significantly higher core clock speed
924 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1695 MHz
63% significantly higher boost clock speed
1038 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

24 GiB
700% significantly more memory
3 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

384 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width
192 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

936.2 GB/s
678% significantly higher memory bandwidth
120.3 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

350 W
75 W
366% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

189.8 Gigapixels/s
280% significantly higher pixel rate
49.82 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

556 Gigatexels/s
569% significantly higher texture rate
83.04 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

35.58 TFLOPS
1239% significantly better floating point performance
2.66 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

10496
720% significantly more shading units
1280

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

328
309% significantly more texture mapping units
80

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

112
133% significantly more render output processors
48

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

25th of 586
238th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2020 September
2014 October

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6X
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.5

GeForce RTX 3090 vs GeForce GTX 970M benchmarks

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce RTX 3090 GPU is faster than the GeForce GTX 970M in gaming.

The GeForce RTX 3090 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce RTX 3090 also has a significantly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the GeForce RTX 3090 has significantly more memory with 24 GiB of memory compared to 3 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 970M has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the GeForce RTX 3090 at 350 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce RTX 3090 is better than the GeForce GTX 970M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons