NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro K4200

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 366.59

$ 149.46

$ 217.13 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

6815 points

658% significantly better overall score

899 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

167 FPS

147 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

20 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

80 FPS

68 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

13 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

118 FPS

104 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

14 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

63 FPS

53 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

10 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and the Quadro K4200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

3000.82 points

1663% significantly higher Blender score

170.14 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

128321 points

1330% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

8973 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

120183 points

923% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

11745 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

95490 points

737% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

11396 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

112303 points

811% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

12321 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

115945 points

831% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

12444 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1410 MHz

80% significantly higher core clock speed

780 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1665 MHz

112% significantly higher boost clock speed

784 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

8 GiB

100% significantly more memory

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

256 Bit

Identical

256 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

448 GB/s

159% significantly higher memory bandwidth

172.8 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

200 W

105 W

90% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

133.2 Gigapixels/s

506% significantly higher pixel rate

21.95 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

253.1 Gigatexels/s

188% significantly higher texture rate

87.81 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

16.20 TFLOPS

668% significantly better floating point performance

2.11 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

4864

261% significantly more shading units

1344

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

152

35% slightly more texture mapping units

112

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

150% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

71st of 586

271st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2020 December

2014 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Quadro K4200 comparison

For gaming, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti graphics card is better than the Quadro K4200 in our tests.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti also has a significantly higher boost clock speed. The boost clock speed is the frequency that the GPU core can reach if the temperature is low enough. The allows for higher performance in certain scenarios.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Quadro K4200 has a significantly lower TDP at 105 W when compared to the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 200 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In terms of raw gaming performance in our GPU benchmark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is better than the Quadro K4200.