NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 930M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 930M, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

640 points

103% significantly better overall score

315 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

14 FPS

7 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

7 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

10 FPS

4 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

5 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

10 FPS

5 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

5 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

8 FPS

4 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

4 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce MX250 and the GeForce 930M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

89.74 points

76% significantly higher Blender score

50.85 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

9734 points

90% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

5123 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

10197 points

91% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

5333 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

9939 points

116% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

4601 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

9326 points

76% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

5294 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

9178 points

93% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

4745 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

937 MHz

0.97% slightly higher core clock speed

928 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1038 MHz

10% slightly higher boost clock speed

941 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

64 Bit

Identical

64 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

48.06 GB/s

233% significantly higher memory bandwidth

14.4 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

10 W

230% significantly lower TDP

33 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

16.61 Gigapixels/s

120% significantly higher pixel rate

7.53 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

24.91 Gigatexels/s

10% slightly higher texture rate

22.58 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

Identical

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

Identical

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

302nd of 586

373rd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 February

2015 March

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce MX250 vs GeForce 930M benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the GeForce MX250 beats the GeForce 930M in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the GeForce MX250 has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce MX250 also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

In addition, the GeForce MX250 has a significantly lower TDP at 10 W when compared to the GeForce 930M at 33 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce MX250 is faster than the GeForce 930M.