NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

399 points

5% slightly better overall score

380 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

8 FPS

9 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Flux Core frame rate

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

6 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

5 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

6 FPS

Identical

6 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

5 FPS

1 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

4 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce MX130 and the Quadro K4100M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

66.46 points

120.97 points

82% significantly higher Blender score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

7156 points

4% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

6821 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

7199 points

38% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

5215 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

6515 points

7058 points

8% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

6717 points

9002 points

34% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1109 MHz

57% significantly higher core clock speed

706 MHz

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

64 Bit

256 Bit

300% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

40.1 GB/s

102.4 GB/s

155% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

30 W

233% significantly lower TDP

100 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

9.51 Gigapixels/s

16.94 Gigapixels/s

78% significantly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

28.54 Gigatexels/s

67.78 Gigatexels/s

137% significantly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

384

1152

200% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

300% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

300% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

353rd of 586

357th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2017 November

2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

GeForce MX130 vs Quadro K4100M benchmarks

For gaming, the GeForce MX130 graphics card is better than the Quadro K4100M in our tests.

Our database shows that the GeForce MX130 has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

In addition, the GeForce MX130 has a significantly lower TDP at 30 W when compared to the Quadro K4100M at 100 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce MX130 over the Quadro K4100M.