NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 2 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

1001 points

801% significantly better overall score

111 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

24 FPS

20 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

4 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

17 FPS

15 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

2 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

16 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

2 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

15 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

1 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 965M and the Quadro K2000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

147.61 points

327% significantly higher Blender score

34.53 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

13861 points

481% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

2385 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

16496 points

540% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

2575 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

16483 points

530% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

2616 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

15820 points

406% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

3121 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

16599 points

534% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

2616 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

944 MHz

26% slightly higher core clock speed

745 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

4 GiB

100% significantly more memory

2 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit

Identical

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

80.19 GB/s

178% significantly higher memory bandwidth

28.8 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

60 W

55 W

9% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

36.8 Gigapixels/s

517% significantly higher pixel rate

5.96 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

73.6 Gigatexels/s

208% significantly higher texture rate

23.84 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1024

166% significantly more shading units

384

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

100% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

263rd of 586

495th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2015 January

2012 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5

DDR3

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5

GeForce GTX 965M vs Quadro K2000M specs and performance

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 965M beats the Quadro K2000M in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 965M has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the GeForce GTX 965M has significantly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Quadro K2000M has a slightly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 965M at 60 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 965M is faster than the Quadro K2000M.