NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 2 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 8 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

575 points
100% significantly better overall score
287 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

11 FPS
4 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
7 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

9 FPS
5 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
4 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

9 FPS
4 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
4 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

8 FPS
4 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
3 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 750 and the Quadro K5100M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

91.81 points
155.79 points
69% significantly higher Blender score
Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Geekbench 5 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

4274 points
5204 points
21% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Metal) score
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

10644 points
38% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
7697 points
Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Geekbench 6 (Metal) score

Metal compute benchmark

4274 points
8639 points
102% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Metal) score
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

10095 points
11800 points
16% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1020 MHz
32% slightly higher core clock speed
771 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

2 GiB
8 GiB
300% significantly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

128 Bit
256 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

80.19 GB/s
115.2 GB/s
43% significantly higher memory bandwidth

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

55 W
81% significantly lower TDP
100 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

17.36 Gigapixels/s
24.67 Gigapixels/s
42% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

34.72 Gigatexels/s
98.69 Gigatexels/s
184% significantly higher texture rate

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

512
1536
200% significantly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

32
128
300% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

16
32
100% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

314th of 586
383rd of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2014 February
2013 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
11.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.5

GeForce GTX 750 vs Quadro K5100M benchmarks

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 750 beats the Quadro K5100M in gaming performance.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 750 has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

Furthermore, the spec sheet for both these GPUs show that the Quadro K5100M has significantly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 2 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 750 has a significantly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the Quadro K5100M at 100 W. Heat output doesn't match power consumption directly but, it's a good estimate.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 750 over the Quadro K5100M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons