NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 3 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

816 points
62% significantly better overall score
501 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

18 FPS
7 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
11 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

11 FPS
2 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate
9 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

13 FPS
4 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
9 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

9 FPS
1 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate
8 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 660 and the Quadro M2000M? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

Blender score

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

122.56 points
131.34 points
7% slightly higher Blender score
Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

8583 points
11041 points
28% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score
Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11381 points
7% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score
10557 points
Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

10693 points
3% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score
10308 points
Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

11353 points
12% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score
10116 points
Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

11858 points
22% slightly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score
9696 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

980 MHz
1029 MHz
5% slightly higher core clock speed

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1032 MHz
1098 MHz
6% slightly higher boost clock speed

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

3 GiB
4 GiB
33% slightly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit
49% significantly larger memory bus width
128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

144.2 GB/s
79% significantly higher memory bandwidth
80.19 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

140 W
55 W
154% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

20.64 Gigapixels/s
17% slightly higher pixel rate
17.57 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

82.56 Gigatexels/s
87% significantly higher texture rate
43.92 Gigatexels/s

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

960
49% significantly more shading units
640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

80
100% significantly more texture mapping units
40

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

24
49% significantly more render output processors
16

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

277th of 586
328th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

-
2015 December

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR5
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

11.0
12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.5
4.5

GeForce GTX 660 vs Quadro M2000M benchmarks

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 660 graphics card is better than the Quadro M2000M in our tests.

Our database shows that the Quadro M2000M has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the Quadro M2000M also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

As stated by the manufacturer, the Quadro M2000M has slightly more memory with 4 GiB of memory compared to 3 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Quadro M2000M has a significantly lower TDP at 55 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 660 at 140 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 660 is faster than the Quadro M2000M.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons