NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 280X 3 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3968 points
135% significantly better overall score
1687 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

88 FPS
48 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate
40 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

53 FPS
28 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate
25 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

64 FPS
29 FPS significantly higher City frame rate
35 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

40 FPS
26 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate
14 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and the Radeon R9 280X? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

6332 points
169% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score
2350 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1500 MHz
76% significantly higher core clock speed
850 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1770 MHz
77% significantly higher boost clock speed
1000 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

6 GiB
100% significantly more memory
3 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit
384 Bit
100% significantly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

288 GB/s
Identical
288 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

120 W
108% significantly lower TDP
250 W

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

84.96 Gigapixels/s
165% significantly higher pixel rate
32 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

169.9 Gigatexels/s
32% slightly higher texture rate
128 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

5.44 TFLOPS
32% slightly better floating point performance
4.10 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1536
2048
33% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

96
128
33% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

48
49% significantly more render output processors
32

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

124th of 586
226th of 586

Family

The product line

-
Radeon R9 200 Series

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 February
-

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6
GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0
12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6
4.5

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon R9 280X specs and performance

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti graphics card is better than the Radeon R9 280X in our tests.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has a significantly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti also has a significantly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

As stated by the manufacturer, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has significantly more memory with 6 GiB of memory compared to 3 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has a significantly lower TDP at 120 W when compared to the Radeon R9 280X at 250 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

According to the results of the hardwareDB benchmark utility, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is faster than the Radeon R9 280X.

Comments

No comments yet! Be the first to leave a comment using the form below.

Keep comments on topic and be polite. Comments are subject to moderation before they are published.

Popular GPU Comparisons