NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 4 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 174.97

$ 119.99

$ 54.98 significantly less expensive

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3968 points

791% significantly better overall score

445 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

88 FPS

77 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

11 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

53 FPS

46 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

7 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

64 FPS

54 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

10 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

40 FPS

36 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

4 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and the Radeon Pro WX 3200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

61373 points

292% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

15640 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

53550 points

224% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

16510 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

65938 points

350% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

14637 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

62004 points

297% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

15582 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1500 MHz

15% slightly higher core clock speed

1295 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

6 GiB

49% significantly more memory

4 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit

49% significantly larger memory bus width

128 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

288 GB/s

200% significantly higher memory bandwidth

96 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

120 W

65 W

84% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

84.96 Gigapixels/s

310% significantly higher pixel rate

20.72 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

169.9 Gigatexels/s

309% significantly higher texture rate

41.44 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

5.44 TFLOPS

227% significantly better floating point performance

1.66 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1536

139% significantly more shading units

640

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

200% significantly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

200% significantly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

124th of 586

345th of 586

Family

The product line

Radeon PRO

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 February

2019 July

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 3200 comparison

According to the hardwareDB Benchmark, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GPU is faster than the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in gaming.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has a slightly higher core clock speed. This is the frequency at which the graphics core is running at. While not necessarily an indicator of overall performance, this metric can be useful when comparing two GPUs based on the same architecture.

As stated by the manufacturer, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has significantly more memory with 6 GiB of memory compared to 4 GiB. If you're planning at playing games at high resolutions with high-quality textures, you will need a lot of memory.

In addition, the Radeon Pro WX 3200 has a significantly lower TDP at 65 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti at 120 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti over the Radeon Pro WX 3200.