NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000 8 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro P4000

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 174.97

$ 101.03 significantly less expensive

$ 276.00

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3968 points

57% significantly better overall score

2522 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

88 FPS

35 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

53 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

53 FPS

11 FPS slightly higher Electron frame rate

42 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

64 FPS

31 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

33 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

40 FPS

8 FPS slightly higher Clouds frame rate

32 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and the Quadro P4000? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

6332 points

29% slightly higher 3DMark Graphics score

4880 points

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

799.88 points

72% significantly higher Blender score

464.31 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

66368 points

69% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

39254 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

61373 points

45% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

42289 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

53550 points

29% slightly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

41279 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

65938 points

55% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

42289 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

62004 points

49% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

41581 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1500 MHz

22% slightly higher core clock speed

1227 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1770 MHz

19% slightly higher boost clock speed

1480 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

6 GiB

8 GiB

33% slightly more memory

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit

256 Bit

33% slightly larger memory bus width

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

288 GB/s

18% slightly higher memory bandwidth

243.3 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

120 W

105 W

14% slightly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

84.96 Gigapixels/s

94.72 Gigapixels/s

11% slightly higher pixel rate

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

169.9 Gigatexels/s

2% slightly higher texture rate

165.8 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

5.44 TFLOPS

2% slightly better floating point performance

5.30 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1536

1792

16% slightly more shading units

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

112

16% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

33% slightly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

124th of 586

175th of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 February

2017 February

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

GDDR5

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

12.1

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

4.5

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Quadro P4000 benchmarks

For gaming, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti graphics card is better than the Quadro P4000 in our tests.

Our database shows that the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has a slightly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti also has a slightly higher boost clock speed: the maximum frequency the chip can reach if power delivery and thermals allow.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the Quadro P4000 has slightly more memory with 8 GiB of memory compared to 6 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Quadro P4000 has a slightly lower TDP at 105 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti at 120 W. This is not a measure of performance, but rather the amount of heat generated by the chip when running at its highest speed.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti over the Quadro P4000.