NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200 5 GB, specs and GPU benchmark score. Which is the better graphics card for the money?

Benchmark Score
Other Benchmarks
Specifications
Comments (0)
Popular Comparisons

GPU Comparison

Quickly search and compare graphics cards

NVIDIA Quadro P2200

Price

The cheapest price from our partner retailers

$ 174.97

$ 24.88 slightly less expensive

$ 199.85

Benchmark Score

Overall Score

General gaming and workstation score

3968 points

86% significantly better overall score

2123 points

Flux Core frame rate

Volumetric ray casting test, a computationally expensive method of rendering high-quality scenes

88 FPS

44 FPS significantly higher Flux Core frame rate

44 FPS

Electron frame rate

Randomly generated noise sphere test

53 FPS

19 FPS significantly higher Electron frame rate

34 FPS

City frame rate

Procedurally generated city scene with voxel rendering

64 FPS

36 FPS significantly higher City frame rate

28 FPS

Clouds frame rate

Real-time noise calculation and ray marching test

40 FPS

14 FPS significantly higher Clouds frame rate

26 FPS

Free GPU Benchmark

Want to compare your graphics card against the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and the Quadro P2200? Download our free and quick PC Performance Test.

Download GPU Benchmark

Other Benchmarks

3DMark Graphics score

High-end graphics benchmark

6332 points

86% significantly higher 3DMark Graphics score

3404 points

Blender score

Cycles Render (Samples per minute)

799.88 points

148% significantly higher Blender score

322.37 points

Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

CUDA compute benchmark

66368 points

118% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (CUDA) score

30389 points

Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

61373 points

86% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (OpenCL) score

32972 points

Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

53550 points

59% significantly higher Geekbench 5 (Vulkan) score

33482 points

Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

OpenCL compute benchmark

65938 points

104% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (OpenCL) score

32320 points

Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

Vulkan compute benchmark

62004 points

98% significantly higher Geekbench 6 (Vulkan) score

31299 points

Specifications

Core Clock Speed

Nominal chip frequency

1500 MHz

49% significantly higher core clock speed

1000 MHz

Boost Clock Speed

Higher turbo frequency when power conditions are met

1770 MHz

18% slightly higher boost clock speed

1493 MHz

Memory

Onboard memory size for textures and vertices

6 GiB

20% slightly more memory

5 GiB

Memory Bus Width

Number of parallel lines to the memory chips

192 Bit

20% slightly larger memory bus width

160 Bit

Memory Bandwidth

Data transfer speed between GPU core and memory

288 GB/s

43% significantly higher memory bandwidth

200.2 GB/s

TDP

Thermal Design Power: Measure of heat generated by the GPU

120 W

75 W

60% significantly lower TDP

Pixel Rate

Number of pixels that can be rendered per second

84.96 Gigapixels/s

42% slightly higher pixel rate

59.72 Gigapixels/s

Texture Rate

Number of textured pixels that can be rendered per second

169.9 Gigatexels/s

42% slightly higher texture rate

119.4 Gigatexels/s

Floating Point Performance

Raw number of floating point operations per second

5.44 TFLOPS

42% slightly better floating point performance

3.82 TFLOPS

Shading Units

Number of processors dedicated to shader processing

1536

20% slightly more shading units

1280

Texture Mapping Units

Number of processors dedicated to applying textures

20% slightly more texture mapping units

Render Output Processors

Number of processors dedicated to final pixel rendering

20% slightly more render output processors

Other details

Rank

Ranking in the hardwareDB database

124th of 586

201st of 586

Release date

The official date of release of this chip

2019 February

2019 June

Memory Type

The type of memory used by this chip

GDDR6

GDDR5X

DirectX Support

Maximum version of DirectX supported

12.0

OpenGL Support

Maximum version of OpenGL supported

4.6

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Quadro P2200 comparison

In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti beats the Quadro P2200 in gaming performance.

In our comparison, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has a significantly higher core clock speed. The core clock speed (or base speed) is the frequency at which the GPU core runs. This metric makes sense when comparing GPUs of a similar architecture or generation. In addition, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti also has a slightly higher boost clock speed. This is a frequency that can be reached if the GPU is cooled sufficiently and has enough power.

Next up, in terms of GPU memory, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has slightly more memory with 6 GiB of memory compared to 5 GiB. Lots of memory is good when playing at high resolutions or with many monitors.

In addition, the Quadro P2200 has a significantly lower TDP at 75 W when compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti at 120 W. TDP (Thermal Design Power) measures total heat output from the chip.

In conclusion, all specs and GPU benchmarks considered, will recommend the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti over the Quadro P2200.